The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) has fueled record-breaking valuations, unprecedented startup funding, and a war for talent across Silicon Valley. But according to Josh Wolfe, co-founder and managing partner at Lux Capital, this boom is exposing cracks in the very foundation of venture capital: the social contract that underpins trust among investors, founders, and talent.

Speaking on a Bloomberg podcast and in an interview published in early September 2025, Wolfe explained why he believes the AI sector faces a trust crisis, with long-term consequences for innovation, investment, and national competitiveness.


AI Is Breaking Silicon Valley’s Social Contract
AI Is Breaking Silicon Valley’s Social Contract


The Breaking of Silicon Valley’s Social Contract

Traditionally, venture capital relied on a covenant of trust:


Investors provide capital and confidence.

Founders build enduring companies.

Talent contributes time and expertise in pursuit of a shared mission.


But Wolfe argues this contract is breaking in the AI boom:


Talent poaching: Top engineers are leaving startups midstream for bigger paychecks or rival opportunities.

Misaligned incentives: Some founders and employees prioritize personal gain over collective success.

Weakened acquisition pathways: Instead of promising startups being acquired, their best talent “walks out the door.”


The result? Harm to startups, workers, and investors — with venture capitalists and limited partners facing greater risk in pursuit of returns.


Covenant Before Contract: Trust as the Foundation

Wolfe stresses that Silicon Valley’s ecosystem is built not just on legal agreements, but on a social covenant of trust:

“The contract starts socially before it becomes legal.”

When this trust erodes — through opportunism or short-termism — the entire ecosystem destabilizes. Venture returns shrink, founders lose backing, and workers face instability.


AI Valuations vs. Labor Realities

While investors chase astronomical AI valuations, Wolfe believes labor market impacts are being underappreciated:


AI valuations may be overhyped, especially among leaders like Nvidia, which he suggests may have peaked in its growth cycle.

Talent churn is more damaging than investors acknowledge — weakening companies before they reach maturity.

The AI gold rush risks mispricing value, creating fragile business models.


Open Source vs. Closed Models: Strategic Implications

Wolfe also highlighted the geopolitical and security dimension of AI development:


Open-source AI models democratize innovation but raise risks of misuse.

Closed models protect intellectual property but may slow collective progress.

Policymakers must balance national security interests with innovation incentives.


Why This Matters for Investors and Founders

For investors and limited partners, Wolfe’s warning is clear:


Due diligence is no longer enough — social cohesion within teams is as critical as financial models.

Talent retention is now a primary risk factor for AI startups.

Valuation discipline is essential in a market prone to hype cycles.


For founders, the lesson is to rebuild trust: aligning incentives, rewarding loyalty, and reinforcing the shared mission beyond personal gain.


Actionable Takeaways

Investors: Look beyond valuations; assess cultural cohesion and talent retention.

Founders: Align incentives transparently to protect against opportunistic exits.

Talent: Choose companies with strong missions, not just compensation packages.

Policy Makers: Balance AI openness with safeguards for national security.


FAQs

1. What does Josh Wolfe mean by Silicon Valley’s “social contract”?
It refers to the trust-based alignment among investors, founders, and employees to build sustainable companies.

2. Why is this contract breaking in the AI boom?
Because of recurring talent poaching, misaligned incentives, and short-term opportunism.

3. How does Wolfe view AI valuations in 2025?
He sees them as overhyped, with some companies like Nvidia potentially past their peak.

4. What risks does talent loss pose to AI startups?
It weakens company execution, delays product development, and undermines investor returns.

5. What’s at stake for national security?
The open vs. closed AI debate affects innovation speed, intellectual property, and defense risks.


Summary

Josh Wolfe warns that Silicon Valley’s AI boom may be undermining its foundation of trust. Unless founders, investors, and talent realign incentives, the broken social contract could slow innovation, weaken returns, and create vulnerabilities in the global AI race.