Breaking News – Corruption Allegations Shake Pakistan's Bureaucracy
In a stunning revelation, Pakistan’s Defence Minister Khawaja Asif has alleged that more than half of the country’s top bureaucrats have purchased property in Portugal and are in the process of securing European citizenship to evade accountability back home.
During his speech, Asif accused these officials of using corrupt money ("black money")—embezzled from public funds—to invest abroad, aiming to retire in luxury while escaping the consequences of their actions in Pakistan.
![]() |
| Pakistan Bureaucrats Buying Portugal Properties |
“Rs4 Billion in Salami” – A Symbol of Corruption?
Highlighting the lavish lifestyles of some bureaucrats, Asif pointed to a shocking incident involving a bureaucrat closely associated with former Punjab Chief Minister Usman Buzdar. He claimed this official received Rs4 billion in wedding "salami" (cash gifts) at his daughter’s wedding—an amount he says is impossible without illicit sources of income.
“This bureaucracy is polluting our land,” Asif said.
“They are silently investing and preparing to flee accountability.”
Why Portugal?
Portugal’s Golden Visa Program, which grants residency and eventual citizenship in return for real estate investment, has been popular among elites from developing nations. According to Asif, corrupt Pakistani bureaucrats are strategically using this route to settle in Europe with the money they illicitly acquired.
Politicians vs Bureaucrats: A Comparison
Asif drew a stark contrast between bureaucrats and politicians:
| Aspect | Bureaucrats | Politicians |
|---|---|---|
| Accountability | Not publicly elected, less exposed | Face public elections |
| Foreign Assets | Many own overseas properties | Fewer reported international holdings |
| Citizenship Plans | Actively seeking European citizenship | Bound to Pakistan due to political ties |
| Public Scrutiny | Minimal | Constant media and voter attention |
The Fallout: Political and Public Reactions
Khawaja Asif’s explosive remarks have sparked debate across political and media circles:
Some have called for an investigation into bureaucrats' overseas assets.Others accuse Asif of deflecting blame from political corruption.
Public frustration is growing over the lack of transparency and justice.
FAQs – Understanding the Portugal Property Scandal
What exactly did Khawaja Asif say?
He alleged that over 50% of Pakistan's senior bureaucrats have purchased properties in Portugal using illegally obtained funds. He also claimed they are preparing to acquire citizenship to escape accountability in Pakistan.
Is there proof of the Portugal property purchases?
While Asif didn’t publicly provide documentary proof during his speech, multiple media reports now highlight the need for a full investigation. Authorities may probe foreign assets declarations and remittances linked to these claims.
Why are bureaucrats choosing Portugal?
Portugal offers a Golden Visa program that allows foreigners to obtain residency—and later citizenship—by investing in real estate. It’s a common choice for those seeking EU citizenship without needing to live there full-time.
Is corruption among bureaucrats a new issue in Pakistan?
No. Corruption has been a long-standing issue, but these claims add a new layer, suggesting a strategic foreign exit plan by senior officials. The scale (over 50%) alleged by Asif is especially alarming.
Can the government take action against these bureaucrats?
Yes, but it depends on political will, access to financial records, and cooperation with international authorities. However, many fear that lack of accountability and weak enforcement may hinder any real consequences.
Conclusion: A Moment of Reckoning?
Khawaja Asif’s allegations have once again exposed the deep-rooted corruption in Pakistan’s governance system. If even partly true, this raises serious questions about trust, transparency, and the future of public service in the country.
With mounting public anger and growing media attention, pressure is building on the government to take concrete steps—not just for political show, but for real reform.
